Diagnosis and treatment of eczema in children

Eczema in children is usually of mild or moderate severity, but it can have a significant psychosocial impact and be challenging to treat. This article discusses the diagnosis and treatment of mild to moderate eczema in children, which can usually be effectively managed in primary care.

Eczema, the clinical phenotype of atopic eczema/dermatitis, affects around 20% of pre-school age children in the UK. The disease manifests during the first year of life in 60% of patients but it can develop at any age. It can have a significant psychosocial impact on the child and their family. While eczema improves or resolves in up to 70% of children, markers of persistence are early onset, severe disease, family history and early allergen sensitisation. 

      NICE guidance on management of eczema in children1 was published in 2007 and is due to be updated soon, as there have been important advances in our understanding of its treatment during this time. The focus of this article is on children with eczema who have disease of mild or moderate severity, in whom diagnosis and management should be possible exclusively within primary care.

Diagnosis

Eczema is diagnosed clinically, the characteristic features being dry, rough and itchy skin. Classically, the cheeks and extensor surfaces are affected in infants, with flexural (especially the cubital and knee folds) involvement later, along with the wrists, ankles and hands (see Table 1). Seborrhoeic dermatitis is the most common differential diagnosis in infants, in which the lesions are early onset, greasy rather than dry, involve the scalp (cradle cap) and are not itchy.


Table 1
. Clinical features of eczema

Management

The main principles of treatment are avoidance of trigger factors, maintenance of the epidermal barrier with emollients, and anti-inflammatory therapy with topical corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. Detergents, wool fabrics, extremes of temperature and humidity, and psychological stress are all factors reported to contribute to eczema ‘flares’. Emollients should be used daily and anti-inflammatory treatments in a step-up/down manner according to disease severity (see Figure 1).


Figure 1.
Eczema treatment escalator. Adapted from NICE, 20071

Emollients

Emollients can be used in three main ways: as a ‘leave-on’ treatment, soap substitute and/or bath additive.

      All patients should use emollients as a leave-on treatment – that is, applying them directly to the skin to add or help retain moisture. Used regularly, they improve the skin barrier and comfort, and may reduce the number of disease flares. Many different emollients can be prescribed or bought over the counter. The main formulations are lotions, creams, gels and ointments, which vary in their consistency from ‘light’ to ‘heavy’. This mainly reflects differences in oil (lipid) to water ratios. Some products also contain humectants, which help retain moisture.

      There is poor evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, adverse effects and cost effectiveness of different products.2,3 This is reflected in the guidance issued by CCGs and Local Health Boards in England and Wales respectively, who have produced over 100 different emollient formularies that made conflicting recommendations on 109 different emollients.4 Recent NHS England guidance5,6 is clear in that, while it discourages the primary care prescribing of emollients for people with ‘mild dry skin’ only, GPs should continue to prescribe them for people with eczema.

      Referring to your local formulary, start with emollients without fragrances, urea or antimicrobials, as these ingredients may cause irritation. Initially, consider prescribing one or more emollients in 100g quantities as ‘testers’, making appropriate amounts (500g or ml) of the preferred emollient(s) available on repeat prescription thereafter. Make allowance for extra supplies needed for nursery or school, and for different ‘homes’ when the child’s parents don’t live together. Give clear directions on their use (see Table 2). You may need to prescribe different emollients for different purposes, eg an ointment from a tub as a leave-on treatment and a cream in a pump for use as a soap substitute.


Table 2.
How to apply emollients

      Bath additives are distinct from other emollients, as they are designed to be poured into the bath and provide ‘passive’ moisturisation. The recently published BATHE trial evaluated their use in 483 children (aged 1–12 years) recruited from primary care.7 Participants were allocated to usual care or usual care plus bath additive with the primary outcome measured at 16 weeks. Neither the primary outcome of patient-reported measure of eczema severity nor any of the secondary outcomes showed any benefit from the use of bath additives. Consequently, most emollient guidelines no longer recommend their use, although it is possible that bath additives may still have a role in adults and products that contain antimicrobials may be appropriate for children with recurrently infected eczema.

Topical corticosteroid and calcineurin inhibitors

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are all classified by their potency from mild through to very potent. Examples are listed in Table 3. The choice of potency should be based on age, body site and severity of eczema. NICE’s recommendation of matching TCS potency to severity (mild for mild eczema, moderate for moderate eczema, potent for severe eczema) is easy to remember and apply, but without any evidence, such as how best to assess severity.8


Table 3
. Topical corticosteroid potencies and examples

      For most people with eczema, TCS are the only anti-inflammatory treatment needed, although topical calcineurin inhibitors may have a place for more severe disease and/or eczema in sensitive sites such as the face. Topical pimecrolimus (Elidel) is licensed for mild to moderate eczema, and topical tacrolimus (Protopic) is licensed for moderate to severe eczema. It is recommended that these treatments are only initiated by a specialist/those experienced in managing eczema, and after failure of TCS and/or when there is the risk of TCS side-effects, particularly skin atrophy.

      Ointments are generally preferable to creams, unless the eczema is weeping or there is patient preference for creams. TCS and calcineurin inhibitors are most commonly used reactively to treat a disease flare, in which case a response to treatment should be expected in 7–14 days, with a view to stepping down or stopping treatment thereafter. However, some patients may benefit from proactive application of TCS on two consecutive days per week (‘weekend therapy’) as a maintenance treatment for ‘hot spots’.9

      Patients and healthcare professionals worry about the risks associated with TCS use, which can be local (skin atrophy, striae and purpura) or systemic (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and growth suppression).10 In fact, side-effects are uncommon in clinical practice and patients may come to more harm from underuse rather than overuse.

      While the quality and availability of data are limited, a recent analysis of 36 systematic reviews of TCS safety in people with eczema is reassuring.11 It found no significant differences in reports from individual short-term randomised controlled trials in the risk of developing skin atrophy with TCS compared to vehicle or between mild and potent TCS, and most trials reported no cases. The largest trial of TCS safety found only one case of skin atrophy in 1213 children followed up for five years. A meta-analysis of short-term observational studies in children showed a low overall rate of biochemical signs of adrenal suppression of 3.8%, which decreased to 2% with mild potency TCS. No clinical symptoms of adrenal insufficiency were observed and the biochemical changes were reversed upon stopping TCS. Skin burning and pruritus are more common with topical calcineurin inhibitors than TCS. The use of wet-wraps was found to significantly increase the rate of folliculitis, and there was a higher risk of local site reactions with topical calcineurin inhibitors compared to TCS, and with TCS compared to Chinese herbal medicine.

      Risks can be minimised by considering the key factors that affect TCS absorption (see Table 4). Long-term treatment, higher potencies, vulnerable sites, use of occlusion and/or extremes of age all increase the potential for harm. The finger-tip unit (FTU) is a practical way of guiding the amount to be used: the amount of TCS that is squeezed out (from a standard 5mm nozzle tube) from the very end of the finger to the first crease in the finger is sufficient to treat a skin area about twice that of the flat of the hand with the fingers together. Once-daily application of TCS is as effective as twice-daily, minimises the risk of adverse effects and simplifies treatment regimens.12 Appropriate use of TCS minimises the risk of TCS withdrawal, data on which are very limited.


Table 4.
Factors to consider for the safe prescribing of topical corticosteroids

Other treatments

Despite the clear association between eczema and Staphylococcus aureus on the skin, there is uncertainty about what constitutes infection and when antibiotic treatments are likely to confer benefit.13 There is no clear evidence that anti-staphylococcal interventions such as antiseptic bath additives, or the addition of antimicrobial agents to topical therapies, are clinically beneficial in non-infected eczema. The CREAM trial, which randomised 113 children with clinically infected eczema flares, found no meaningful benefit from oral or topical antibiotics over placebo.14 Instead, stepping-up TCS may be a more helpful approach in this situation.

      Specialist clothing manufacturers claim benefits for the management of eczema by helping to regulate humidity and temperature, and possibly through an antimicrobial action. However, the CLOTHES trial found no evidence of any difference between the 300 children randomised to receive silk garments and standard eczema care alone. While this does not preclude parents from purchasing such garments themselves, the findings argue strongly against them being prescribed on the NHS, and silk garments were included in the June 2019 update of the NHS England guidance on items that should not routinely be prescribed in primary care.6

      While some guidelines suggest use of sedating, first‐generation oral antihistamines when eczema causes sleep disturbance, for most children they have no role. Oral corticosteroids should be avoided in all but the most severe exacerbations, in which case specialist input is warranted.

Overcoming treatment barriers

Treatment should be guided by disease severity, and carer and older children’s preferences, especially with respect to emollients where acceptability may be influenced by severity, body site, season/climate and cultural beliefs. Recent research has highlighted the importance of identifying and addressing parents’ concerns, which can otherwise lead to poor treatment adherence and outcomes.15

      A common but sometimes unvoiced concern is diet in the affected child and/or the breastfeeding mother. While immediate-type food allergies are more common, evidence that foods such as milk, egg or wheat cause the ongoing symptoms of eczema in most children is weak. The role of allergy tests is also controversial and is now the subject of a feasibility trial.16 There is some evidence that probiotics taken during late pregnancy and breastfeeding (from 36 to 38 weeks gestation through to the first three to six months of lactation) may reduce the risk of eczema in offspring.17

      Evaluating disease severity in psychosocial as well as physical terms, acknowledging the challenges of using topical therapies long-term, and emphasising the ‘control not cure’ message can all help. However, even relatively simple treatment regimens can be difficult to follow, so aiming for ‘two treatments [emollient and TCS] used well’, backed up by a written action plan (see Figure 2; www.bristol.ac.uk/ewap) with links to further information and online videos, may support self-management.18,19 The ECO programme20 is currently developing and evaluating a website to help people look after children with eczema, but meanwhile there are plenty of sources of reliable information available from eczema support groups (see below).


(Click here for the article PDF). 
Figure 2.
Eczema written action plan. ©University of Bristol

Conclusion

Although most children with eczema have mild to moderate disease, the impact and challenges of managing the condition should not be underestimated. Two treatments (emollients and TCS) used well can control eczema symptoms in the majority of children. The focus for emollients should be on finding one or more ‘simple’ types that parent and child are willing to use daily as ‘leave-on’ treatment. For topical corticosteroids, concerns about safety should be addressed and potency matched to site and severity of disease.

      Supporting information, such as in the form of a written action plan, can help support families in knowing what to use where and when, as well as helping address some of the practical day-to-day issues such as swimming, use of sunscreens and nurse/school attendance. If disease control is poor despite this, then referral to a community or hospital dermatology clinic should be made for further advice and potentially specialist treatment.

Sources of further information and advice for people with eczema

National Eczema Society – 0800 089 1122 or www.eczema.org

Eczema Outreach Support – 0800 622 6018 or www.eos.org.uk

Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema – www.nottinghameczema.org.uk or @eczemasupport (Twitter).

Declaration of interests

None to declare.

Dr Matthew Ridd is a GP and Reader in Primary Healthcare, Centre for Academic Primary Care Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol

References

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atopic eczema in under 12s: diagnosis and management. CG57. December 2007. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg57
  2. Van Zuuren EJ, et al. Emollients and moisturisers for eczema. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD012119.
  3. Bhanot A, et al. Adverse events from emollient use in eczema: a restricted review of published data. Dermatol Ther 2019;9(2):193–208.
  4. Chan JP, Ridd MJ. Beliefs and practices among adults with eczema and carers of children with eczema regarding the role of food allergy. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019;44(7):e235–7.
  5. NHS England, NHS Clinical Commissioners. Conditions for which over the counter items should not routinely be prescribed in primary care: guidance for CCGs. March 2018. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/conditions-for-which-over-the-counter-items-should-not-routinely-be-prescribed-in-primary-care-guidance-for-ccgs/
  6. NHS England, NHS Clinical Commissioners. Items which should not be routinely prescribed in primary care: guidance for CCGs. Updated June 2019. Available from: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/
    11/items-which-should-not-be-routinely-precscribed-in-pc-ccg-guidance.pdf
  7. Santer M, et al. Emollient bath additives for the treatment of childhood eczema (BATHE). BMJ 2018;361:k1332.
  8. Jacquet L, et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of childhood eczema in primary care. BJGP Open 2017;1(2):bjgpopen17X100821.
  9. Schmitt J, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of proactive treatment with topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors for atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 2011;164(2):415–28.
  10. Li AW, et al. Topical corticosteroid phobia in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol 2017;153(10):1036–42.
  11. Mead E, et al. The safety of topical corticosteroids in atopic eczema: an overview of systematic reviews. International Symposium on Atopic Dermatitis. April 2018. Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  12. Williams HC. Established corticosteroid creams should be applied only once daily in patients with atopic eczema. BMJ 2007;334(7606):1272–72.
  13. Bath-Hextall FJ, et al. Interventions to reduce Staphylococcus aureus in the management of atopic eczema: an updated Cochrane review. Br J Dermatol 2010;163(1):12–26.
  14. Francis NA, et al. Oral and topical antibiotics for clinically infected eczema in children. Ann Fam Med 2017;15(2):124–30.
  15. Powell K, et al. GP and parent dissonance about the assessment and treatment of childhood eczema in primary care. BMJ Open 2018;
    8(2):e019633.
  16. Ridd MJ, et al. TEST (Trial of Eczema allergy Screening Tests): protocol for feasibility randomised controlled trial of allergy tests in children with eczema, including economic scoping and nested qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019;9(5):e028428.
  17. Garcia-Larsen V, et al. Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease. PLOS Med 2018;15(2):e1002507.
  18. Powell K, et al. Developing a written action plan for children with eczema: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68(667):e81–9.
  19. Ridd MJ, et al. Systematic review of self-management interventions for people with eczema. Br J Dermatol 2017;177(3):719–34.
  20. Eczema Care Online. ECO project: about the research. Available from: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/eco/about-the-research/about-the-research.aspx

Diagnosis and treatment of eczema in children.

Add yours ↓
Web design and marketing agency Leamington Spa